Skip to main content
Jonathan Lord
for Woking

Main navigation

  • Home
  • About Jonathan Lord
  • News
  • Woking
  • Parliament
  • Policy Replies
  • Contact
Jonathan Lord
for Woking

Channel 4

  • Tweet

November 2021

 

Dear Constituent,

 

Thank you for contacting me about Channel 4.

 

After receiving other emails from constituents expressing their concerns about the future of Channel 4, I wrote to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport for a response. I have attached the contents of their letter below that I hope you will find of interest and will help to explain the Government’s current position on this matter:

 

“Thank you for writing on behalf of your constituents about the future of Channel 4.

 

The Government is consulting on whether an alternative ownership model for Channel 4 (but one where it retains a public service remit) may be better for the broadcaster, and better for the country. We want Channel 4 to continue to be a public service broadcaster (PSB), and we want it to continue to contribute socially, economically and culturally. But all linear TV broadcasters are facing significant challenges in today’s changing media landscape, and these challenges are only set to intensify.

 

Indeed, Ofcom, in their latest recommendations to the Government on the future of public service media published on 15 July, outlined what it called the ‘rapid change in the industry – driven by global commercial trends and a transformation in viewing habits - which is making it harder for PSBs to compete for audiences and maintain.’ Your constituents can read Ofcom’s full review here.

 

Channel 4 is uniquely constrained in its ability to meet these challenges while it remains under public ownership - particularly because its access to capital and ability to pursue strategic partnership opportunities is limited.

 

Your constituents have highlighted that Channel 4 is in good financial health. While it is correct that Channel 4 recorded a surplus last year, this was only as a result of it cutting its programme budget by £138 million. In terms of the channel’s longer-term financial sustainability, Channel 4’s revenue is largely undiversified and driven almost entirely by advertising activities. Linear TV advertising accounted for over 90% of Channel 4’s revenue in 2020, but total linear advertising revenues have declined across the whole sector at a compound annual rate of 2.5% since 2015. Moving Channel 4 into private ownership may allow it to diversify its income streams, access new capital, and create strategic partnerships only available through the private sector.

 

With regards to the channel’s importance to independent production, the Government recognises that Channel 4 has consistently delivered on its remit in the decades since being established, including supporting the UK’s independent production sector. Forty years on, this sector is now flourishing, with increased spending on commissions from both PSBs and the multichannel groups. The incredible growth of the sector has seen the contribution of non-PSBs to sector revenue rising from 36% to 58%, due in large part to the growth of international revenue. It is the Government’s assessment that changes to the publisher-broadcaster restriction could allow Channel 4 to achieve greater financial diversification and shift its reliance away from linear advertising revenues.

 

In making any changes to Channel 4’s ownership model it is noted that this may have both costs and benefits for the independent production sector and the Government is seeking views on this, both through the consultation and in meetings with stakeholders. The Government also intends to maintain Channel 4's remit and is seeking views on possible amendments to it - this could include strengthening the remit in certain areas.

 

Finally, with regards to levelling up, the Government recognises that Channel 4 makes an important economic and social contribution across the regions and nations of the UK through its national HQ in Leeds, its creative hubs in both Glasgow and Bristol, and its investment in regional production. As stated in the consultation document, the Government “considers that a continued and renewed commitment to levelling up may be appropriately tied to any change in ownership as the Government looks to improve living standards, investment, opportunity and outcomes across the whole country”. Any options we decide to pursue following the consultation would need to consider how to ensure Channel 4 continues its role in supporting levelling up across the UK. You can read about the results of the consultation at the following link.

 

Thank you again for writing to the DCMS and I hope your constituents find this response useful.”

 

With best wishes.

 

Kind regards,

 

Jonathan Lord MP

Member of Parliament for Woking

 

Policy Replies

  • Plastic Polution
  • School Cuts
  • UK CBDC
  • Keeping Retail Workers Safe
  • NHS Funding
  • Education Funding
  • Vaping
  • Hunting Trophies
  • IHR Amendments
  • Living with Diabetes
  • Pet theft
  • Local Housing Allowance
  • Pig Farming
  • Protect Our Seas and Oceans
  • Puppy Smuggling
  • Ban on Snares
  • Dementia
  • Live Animal and Horse Exports
  • Solar farms
  • Disposable Vapes
  • Canals
  • Private Jets
  • Digital Pound
  • Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act
  • Nature
  • First Past the Post
  • Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill
  • Snares
  • Access to the Countryside
  • Home Schooling
  • Brachycephalic Animals
  • Illegal Migration Bill
  • International Health Regulations
  • Draft Animal Welfare (Electronic Collars) Regulations
  • Humanitarian situation in East Africa
  • Diabetes UK
  • Helping farmers help nature
  • Universal Periodic Review of Nigeria’s human rights
  • Protect literary landscapes
  • Deep sea mining
  • Teacher Pay
  • Onshore wind
  • Procurement Bill
  • Kept Animals Bill
  • Affordable Public Transport
  • Catch Up With Cancer
  • Local Government Funding
  • Renters Reform
  • Exempt Accommodation
  • Smart Road User Charging
  • Bank 'Windfall Tax'
  • Wagner Group: Sanctions
  • Sewage discharges
  • Nature in Woking
  • “Taking the Biscuit” campaign
  • Onshore Wind (Planning)
  • Business and Human Rights
  • Pig welfare
  • Pandemic Treaty
  • Early Years Nutrition
  • Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill (Childcare as Infrastructure)
  • Pet theft
  • Bring back the Bill campaign (Online Safety Bill)
  • Animal welfare
  • Strikes
  • Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill
  • Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill
  • March of the Mummies campaign and support for working parents
  • Environmental Protections
  • Ocean protection
  • Sustainable fishing
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Gamebird Battery Cages
  • Fracking
  • Humanitarian situation in East Africa
  • Plastic pollution
  • Social Security
  • Support for pubs
  • Animal Testing (Medicines & Drugs)
  • Maternity Services
  • Maternity leave and maternity pay
  • Hunting Act
  • Firework regulations
  • Deforestation
  • Hedgerow Heroes project
  • Jagtar Singh Johal
  • Housing and Renting
  • Treatment and research for dementia
  • Farm animal welfare
  • Social care reform
  • Asylum seekers and their right to work
  • Northern Ireland Protocol Bill
  • The Elections Act and the Electoral Commission
  • Gambling
  • Gene Editing and Animal Welfare
  • Breed Specific Legislation (BSL)
  • Military’s Use of Bear Fur
  • Caged Farm Animals
  • Fuel Duty
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Women's Health Strategy - Miscarriage
  • Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in developing countries
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Down Syndrome Act
  • Elections Bill
  • Publix Sexual Harrasment
  • Fracking
  • Prescription Charges
  • White Tailed Eagles
  • Uplands
  • Badgers and Bovine TB
  • Environment Act: Ancient Woodland
  • Cash Availability and Acceptance
  • Dangerous Dogs Act
  • Arthritis
  • Guide dogs
  • Puppy smuggling
  • Live Exports
  • Eating disorders
  • Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill
  • Fur and Foie Gras
  • PCSC Bill and Protest
  • Gambling Review
  • Energy Prices
  • Animal Sentience
  • Nationality & Borders Bill
  • Arthur Labinjo-Hughes
  • Channel 4
  • Peatlands
  • COVAX Initiative
  • State Pension Triple Lock
  • Standards Procedure
  • Sewage and the Environment Bill
  • Health and Care Bill
  • Pig industry
  • Electoral Reform
  • Climate Change
  • Energy standards of homes
  • Green Investment
  • Universal Credit
  • Building Safety Bill
  • Cambo Oil Field
  • Food banks
  • Fur
  • Unexploded ordnance at sea.
  • Afghanistan (August 2021)
  • Animal testing
  • Coronavirus: Nepal
  • EU Settlement Scheme deadline
  • Coronavirus: arthritis
  • Coronavirus: vaccine boosters for asthma patients
  • Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill
  • Pension Credit
  • Plastic waste
  • Grouse shooting
  • Medical data (GPDPR)
  • Australia trade deal
  • Football Index
  • Mental health services for children and young people
  • Environment Bill
  • Trophy hunting
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Calories on menus; Eating Disorders
  • Overseas Aid
  • Voter ID
  • The treatment of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang
  • Overseas Operations Bill
  • Private sector involvement in the NHS
  • Trade Bill: genocide
  • Bovine TB
  • BT
  • Tibet
  • Unexploded ordnance at sea
  • International travel
  • Conversion Therapy
  • Cladding and fire safety issues
  • Oceans
  • Misogyny
  • Clapham Common
  • Rape cases and convictions
  • E-scooter concerns
  • Climate and Ecological Emergency Bill
  • NHS pay (March 2021)
  • The Royal Family
  • Electric Scooters
  • The Pig Husbandry (Farrowing) Bill
  • Debt Relief Orders (DROs)
  • Saudi Arabia and Yemen
  • Environment Issues Locally and Nationally
  • Support for unpaid carers
  • Access to the EU for British athletes
  • Support for people with MND
  • Support for the terminally ill
  • Pet travel
  • Rent Debt
  • UK-EU trade deal: the fashion and textiles industry
  • Coronavirus vaccines and immunity passports
  • School Breakfast Bill
  • "Fire and rehire" concerns
  • Jagtar Singh Johal
  • UKRI Funding
  • Support for the hospitality sector
  • Napier and Penally Barracks
  • Reopening schools
  • Coronavirus vaccine: people with learning disabilities
  • BTEC examinations
  • Trail Hunting
  • Neonicotinoids
  • Business rates
  • Visa-free work permits for artists and musicians
  • Parliamentary scrutiny of future free trade agreements
  • Trade Bill: 'Anti-genocide' amendment
  • Universal Credit
  • Woodhouse Colliery
  • Coronavirus and the early years sector
  • Food parcels and free school meals
  • Vaccinations for school staff
  • Recognising key workers
  • Coronavirus: testing of arrivals
  • Schools
  • Coronavirus vaccination programme
  • The planning system and the protection of ancient woodlands and trees
  • Use of the whip in horseracing
  • Coronavirus Vaccine Concerns
  • Alzheimer's Society Campaign
  • Pavement Parking
  • Legacy benefits
  • Public Sector Pay
  • Free School Meals
  • Government Spending Review: Radiotherapy
  • Safe and legal routes for refugees and asylum seekers
  • Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill
  • Finn's Law
  • First Past The Post
  • Support for charity funded research groups
  • Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
  • GMB Union Concerns
  • Support for businesses in the hospitality sector
  • Support for businesses in the night-time industry
  • Beer duty
  • Agriculture Bill, British farming and food standards
  • Food standards and future trade deals
  • Global Wildlife Trade
  • Animal Sentience
  • Overseas Operations Bill
  • Breast cancer related treatment in the upcoming Comprehensive Spending Review
  • Persecution of Christians
  • Fire Safety Bill
  • Government's Strategy on Obesity
  • Close the Loophole Campaign
  • Homelessness
  • Shukri Yahye-Abdi
  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Asylum Support
  • Bovine TB
  • Coronavirus: weddings
  • NHS pay
  • Uyghur Muslims
  • Trade Bill: NC4
  • Sustainable fishing
  • Fur trade
  • Arthritis
  • Environment Bill
  • Private sector involvement in the NHS
  • A green and fair recovery from the coronavirus outbreak
  • Coronavirus: UK international response
  • Human rights in Bahrain
  • Ethnicity pay gaps and pay gap reporting
  • TV licences for the over 75s
  • Tibet
  • Gaza
  • Hong Kong
  • Coronavirus: support for the arts
  • Immigration and Social Security Coordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill
  • Coronavirus: reflexologists
  • Coronavirus: jury trials
  • Grenfell
  • Yemen
  • Arms exports to Saudi Arabia
  • Israel and Palestine issues
  • Statutory assessments in primary schools
  • Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on BAME groups
  • Brexit: transition period
  • Teaching of Black history in schools.
  • Food standards
  • Free school meal vouchers
  • Belly Mujinga
  • Black Lives Matter
  • Climate change - Three Demands Bill
  • Lockdown Issues and the Prime Minister’s Adviser
  • Child refugees and family reunion
  • NHS and the Trade Bill
  • Agriculture Bill
  • Elections Bill
  • Coronavirus and the hospitality sector
  • Coronavirus: schools
  • Coronavirus: Democratic Planning
  • UK-US trade negotiations
  • No Recourse to Public Funds campaign
  • Coronavirus: veterinarians
  • Coronavirus: list of vulnerable people
  • Coronavirus: charities
  • 5G
  • EU Settlement Scheme
  • Coronavirus: Response on Emergency Legislation
  • Onshore wind
  • Childminders
  • Coronavirus: Cremations and burials
  • Windrush Generation
  • Commonwealth Armed Forces Personnel
  • Animal Welfare standards and the UK's trade policy
  • British nature
  • Online Harm
  • Trade Agreement Concerns
  • Middle East Peace Process
  • Environment Bill
  • Hearing Loss
  • Deforestation
  • Dementia
  • Clean Air
  • UK’s Future Agricultural Policy
  • Help protect the oceans
  • Climate Change
  • Asylum seekers & refugees resettlement
  • Voter ID
  • Animal Cruelty Sentencing
  • New mothers' mental health.
  • Caged farm animals
  • NHS and international trade
  • Hong Kong
  • Animal Cruelty
  • Pledge to protect our rivers
  • Live Animal Exports
  • Torture
  • Grenfell - a new housing regulator

Jonathan Lord

Footer

  • About RSS
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • About Jonathan Lord
  • Parliament
  • Woking
This website is funded by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) for the purpose of assisting Jonathan Lord in the performance of his Parliamentary duties.
Copyright 2025 Jonathan Lord . All rights reserved.
Powered by Bluetree